Stock Simulators for 2025

Stock Simulators for 2025

We found 11 online brokers that are appropriate for Trading Stock Simulator Investment.

Stock Simulators Guide

Analysis by Andrew Blumer, Updated Last updated – July 31, 2025

Stock Simulators

Stock simulators are a real blessings for traders. Particularly for beginners who are looking ahead to explore the market, believing regular money can be earned.

There are several stock simulators available. Each offers a bouquet of benefits and features. Some of the stock simulators are easy to use, while several others are more complex and offer more advanced securities, like currency trading and options.

There are even some that offer nothing special. They just simply provide a tutorial or guide to help investors learn more about the ins and outs of trading. Some stock simulators come equipped with contests to test the skills of traders and even give opportunities for them to win real money.

So, a question might arise as to which are the best stock simulators. Selecting one from out of the many basically depends on one’s skill level. It is better to start with a basic offering before moving on to a more sophisticated one.

Stock Simulators – Key Highlights

• A safe and structured environment is offered.
• Investors learn about investing using virtual money with no risk of real money.

How the Market Works

‘How the Market Works’ is one of the most popular stock simulators. Signing up is required before using it. The process is easy and can be done by submitting an email address and age, along with a few other details, like how much virtual cash one would like to start with.

Investors can buy mutual funds, ETFs, and stocks through it. With short-selling and currency trading, one can practice more advanced strategies. Investors can also get detailed insight regarding penny stocks.

The stock simulators provide several trading modes like real-time hours to match the market, or fun mode, to trade throughout the day or night.

The platforms also provide a plethora of educational articles to help investors learn how to get started in trading.

‘How the Market Works’ is also equipped with several attractive features, including trailing stops and limit orders.

Wall Street Survivor

‘Wall Street Survivor’ too is one of the most popular stock stimulators, which also offers virtual stock trading. To start with, one needs to sign up. It helps amateur traders to upgrade skills by offering many educational courses, like ‘Getting Started In The Stock Market’.

The platform is perfect for entry-level investors, and comes with a social-media style design. Stock research and analyst ratings are also provided in simple words to make them easily understandable for novice traders.

Experienced investors may find the information a bit basic, yet the platform is user-friendly and simple to navigate. The chat room is an added feature for traders of all levels.

Investopedia’s Stock Simulator

It is well integrated, and offers an ample amount of financial education content to users who can start off with a virtual balance of $100. It also includes several guides on stocks, short positions, trade types, and much more.

The actual trading here is in the context of a game. One can either create a custom game or join an existing one. Examples of the types of games offered are, Canadian stocks and U.S. stocks. These are targeted toward novice traders.

The games can be customized by adjustable commission rates, margin trading, options, and several other choices. Investors can review holdings, check rankings, and do many more things on this platform.

Stock Simulators Verdict

Stock simulators provide a safe and structured environment for traders, by offering a cornucopia of features and benefits. Investors learn trading by following a plethora of educational content. They can enhance their trading skills by starting with a demo account that comes with virtual money.

In this article, we briefly talked about the three most popular stock simulators, and tried to explain why these are the best in the industry.

The first, ‘How the Market Works’ is easy to use. Signing up is easy and it comes with several attractive features. The second we discussed is the ‘Wall Street Survivor’. It is basically the best for novice traders and beginners. It is equipped with a social-media design and offers analyst ratings and stock research.

The third simulator discussed is Investopedia’s ‘Stock Simulator’. It is well-integrated with useful content, like financial education and guides on topics like purchasing stocks, covering short positions, and advanced trade types.

Stock simulators are great for beginners to help them learn how to pick securities and how to make trades without risking any real money.

We have conducted extensive research and analysis on over multiple data points on Stock Simulators to present you with a comprehensive guide that can help you find the most suitable Stock Simulators. Below we shortlist what we think are the best Stock Simulator investment brokers after careful consideration and evaluation. We hope this list will assist you in making an informed decision when researching Stock Simulators.

Reputable Stock Simulators Checklist

Selecting a reliable and reputable online Stock Simulator Investment trading brokerage involves assessing their track record, regulatory status, customer support, processing times, international presence, and language capabilities. Considering these factors, you can make an informed decision and trade Stock Simulator Investment more confidently.

Selecting the right online Stock Simulator Investment trading brokerage requires careful consideration of several critical factors. Here are some essential points to keep in mind:

• Ensure your chosen Stock Simulator Investment broker has a solid track record of at least two years in the industry.
• Verify that the Stock Simulator Investment broker has a customer support team of at least 15 members responsive to queries and concerns.
• Check if the Stock Simulator Investment broker operates under the regulatory framework of a jurisdiction that can hold it accountable for any misconduct or resolve disputes fairly and impartially.
• Ensure that the Stock Simulator Investment broker can process deposits and withdrawals within two to three days, which is crucial when you need to access your funds quickly.
• Look for Stock Simulator Investment brokers with an international presence in multiple countries, offering its clients local seminars and training programs.
• Ensure the Stock Simulator Investment broker can hire staff from diverse locations worldwide who can communicate fluently in your local language.

Our team have listed brokers that match your criteria for you below. All brokerage data has been summarised into a comparison table. Scroll down.

Compare Key Features of Stock Simulator Investment Brokers in Our Brokerage Comparison Table

When choosing a broker for Stock Simulator investment trading, it’s essential to compare the different options available to you. Our Stock Simulator investment brokerage comparison table below allows you to compare several important features side by side, making it easier to make an informed choice.

• Minimum deposit requirement for opening an account with each Stock Simulator investment broker.
• The funding methods available for Stock Simulator investment with each broker.
• The types of instruments you can trade with each Stock Simulator investment broker, such as forex, stocks, commodities, and indices.
• The trading platforms each Stock Simulator investment broker provides, including their features, ease of use, and compatibility with your devices.
• The spread type (if applicable) for each Stock Simulator investment broker affects the cost of trading.
• The level of customer support each Stock Simulator investment broker offers, including their availability, responsiveness, and quality of service.
• Whether each Stock Simulator investment broker offers Micro, Standard, VIP, or Islamic accounts to suit your trading style and preferences.

By comparing these essential features, you can choose a Stock Simulator investment broker that best suits your needs and preferences for Stock Simulator investment. Our Stock Simulator investment broker comparison table simplifies the process, allowing you to make a more informed decision.

Top 15 Stock Simulator Investment Brokers of 2025 compared

Here are the top Stock Simulator Investment Brokers.

Compare Stock Simulator investment brokers for min deposits, funding, used by, benefits, account types, platforms, and support levels. When searching for a Stock Simulator investment broker, it’s crucial to compare several factors to choose the right one for your Stock Simulator investment needs. Our comparison tool allows you to compare the essential features side by side.

All brokers below are Stock Simulator investment brokers. Learn more about what they offer below.

You can scroll left and right on the comparison table below to see more Stock Simulator investment brokers that accept Stock Simulator investment clients.

Print this article

Indexing metadata

How to cite item

Review policy

• View
• Subscribe

• By Issue
• By Author
• By Title
• Other Journals

Investment management approaches: A comprehensive review of equity trading simulators, methodological challenges, and future directions

Meshal I. Alhusaynan, Majed Almashari
Article ID: 4463
Vol 8, Issue 7, 2024

VIEWS – 1182 (Abstract)

Abstract

This paper provides a comprehensive review of equity trading simulators, focusing on their performance in assuring pre-trade compliance and portfolio investment management. A systematic search was conducted that covered the period of January 2000 to May 2023 and used keywords related to equity trade simulators, portfolio management, pre-trade compliance, online trading, and artificial intelligence. Studies demonstrating the use of simulators and online platforms specific to portfolio investment management, written in English, and matching the specified query were included. Abstracts, commentaries, editorials, and studies unrelated to finance and investments were excluded. The data extraction process included data related to challenges in modern portfolio trading, online stock trading strategies, the utilization of deep learning, the features of equity trade simulators, and examples of equity trade simulators. A total of 32 studies were included in the systematic review and were approved for qualitative analysis. The challenges identified for portfolio trading included the subjective nature of the inputs, variations in the return distributions, the complexity of blending different investments, considerations of liquidity, trading illiquid securities, optimal portfolio execution, clustering and classification, the handling of special trading days, the real-time pricing of derivatives, and transaction cost models (TCMs). Portfolio optimization techniques have evolved to maximize portfolio returns and minimize risk through optimal asset allocation. Equity trade simulators have become vital tools for portfolio managers, enabling them to assess investment strategies, ensure pre-trade compliance, and mitigate risks. Through simulations, portfolio managers can test investment scenarios, identify potential hazards, and improve their decision-making process.

Keywords

equity trading simulators; portfolio investment management; pre-trade compliance

Full Text:

References

1. Aburto, L., Romero-Romero, R., Linfati, R., et al. (2023). An Approach for a Multi-Period Portfolio Selection Problem by considering Transaction Costs and Prediction on the Stock Market. Complexity, 2023, 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1155/2023/3056411
2. Ahmadi-Javid, A., & Fallah-Tafti, M. (2019). Portfolio optimization with entropic value-at-risk. European Journal of Operational Research, 279(1), 225–241. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2019.02.007
3. Al Janabi, M. A. M. (2007). Risk analysis, reporting and control of equity trading exposure: Viable applications to the Mexican financial markets. Journal of Derivatives & Hedge Funds, 13(1), 33–58. https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.jdhf.1850059
4. Al-Gasawneh, J. A., AL-Hawamleh, A. M., Alorfi, A., et al. (2022). Moderating the role of the perceived security and endorsement on the relationship between per-ceived risk and intention to use the artificial intelligence in financial services. International Journal of Data and Network Science, 6(3), 743–752. https://doi.org/10.5267/j.ijdns.2022.3.007
5. Alves, T. W. (2020). Shift: A Highly Realistic Financial Market Simulation Platform. Available online: https://arxiv.org/abs/2002.11158 (accessed on 12 January 2024).
6. Ammann, M., & Schaub, N. (2021). Do Individual Investors Trade on Investment-Related Internet Postings? Management Science, 67(9), 5679–5702. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2020.3733
7. Amrouni, S., Moulin, A., Vann, J., et al. (2021). ABIDES-gym. Proceedings of the Second ACM International Conference on AI in Finance. https://doi.org/10.1145/3490354.3494433
8. Andraszewicz, S., Kaszás, D., Zeisberger, S., et al. (2022). The Influence of Upward Social Comparison on Retail Trading Behavior. https://doi.org/10.31219/osf.io/48deq
9. Ang, A., Papanikolaou, D., & Westerfield, M. M. (2014). Portfolio Choice with Illiquid Assets. Management Science, 60(11), 2737–2761. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2014.1986
10. Anginer, D., Piza, C., Ray, S., et al. (2020). Trading Simulations and Real Money Outcomes. SSRN Electronic Journal. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3634775
11. Annette, L., Nazareth, D. P., Wardwell, L.L.P. (2015). SEC Adopts Regulation SCI to Strengthen Securities Market Infrastructure. Available online: https://corpgov.law.harvard.edu/2015/01/07/sec-adopts-regulation-sci-to-strengthen-securities-market-infrastructure/ (accessed on 12 January 2024).
12. Aragon, G. O., & Ferson, W. E. (2006). Portfolio Performance Evaluation. Foundations and Trends® in Finance, 2(2), 83–190. https://doi.org/10.1561/0500000015
13. Babel, B., Buehler, K., Pivonka, A., et al. (2019). Derisking machine learning and artificial intelligence—The added risk brought on by the complexi-ty of machine-learning models can be mitigated by making well-targeted modifications to existing validation frameworks. Available online: https://www.mckinsey.com/capabilities/risk-and-resilience/our-insights/derisking-machine-learning-and-artificial-intelligence#/ (accessed on 6 January 2024).
14. Back, C., Morana, S., & Spann, M. (2023). When do robo-advisors make us better investors? The impact of social design elements on investor behavior. Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics, 103, 101984. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socec.2023.101984
15. Bakoush, M. (2022). Evaluating the role of simulation-based experiential learning in improving satisfaction of finance students. The International Journal of Management Education, 20(3), 100690. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijme.2022.100690
16. Balakrishnan, V., Khan, I. A., & Birkök, M. C. (2022). Atlantis Highlights in Social Sciences, Education and Humanities. In: Proceedings of the 2022 3rd International Conference on Modern Education and Information Management (ICMEIM 2022). Atlantis Press International BV. https://doi.org/10.2991/978-94-6463-044-2
17. Bank of England. (2020). Evaluation of the senior managers and certification regime Available online: https://www.bankofengland.co.uk/-/media/boe/files/prudential-regulation/report/evaluation-of-smcr-2020.pdf?la=en&hash=151E78315E5C50E70A6B8B08AE3D5E93563D0168 (accessed on 12 January 2024).
18. Bansal, S., Garg, I., & Sharma, G. (2019). Social Entrepreneurship as a Path for Social Change and Driver of Sustainable Development: A Systematic Review and Research Agenda. Sustainability, 11(4), 1091. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11041091
19. Barber, B. M., Huang, X., Odean, T., et al. (2022). Attention‐Induced Trading and Returns: Evidence from Robinhood Users. The Journal of Finance, 77(6), 3141–3190. Portico. https://doi.org/10.1111/jofi.13183
20. Belim, T., Soni, S., Sharma, S. (2023). A Study On Equity Derivatives And Challenges Faced By New Traders. International Research Journal of Modernization in Engineering Technology and Science, 5(2). https://doi.org/10.56726/irjmets33671
21. Biondo, A. E., Mazzarino, L., & Rossello, D. (2022). Portfolio Optimization and Trading Strategies: a simulation ap-proach. CEUR Workshop Proceedings, 3182. https://ceur-ws.org/Vol-3182/paper8.pdf(accessed on 12 January 2024).
22. Borsboom, C., & Zeisberger, S. (2020). What makes an investment risky? An analysis of price path characteristics. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 169, 92–125. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jebo.2019.11.002
23. Byrd, D., Hybinette, M., & Balch, T. H. (2020). ABIDES. Proceedings of the 2020 ACM SIGSIM Conference on Principles of Advanced Discrete Simulation. https://doi.org/10.1145/3384441.3395986
24. Cesari, R., & Cremonini, D. (2003). Benchmarking, portfolio insurance and technical analysis: a monte carlo compari-son of dynamic strategies of asset allocation. Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, 27(6), 987–1011.
25. Checklist, S. P. (2018). Strategic Plan Checklist Strategic Plan Checklist. Available online: https://www.sec.gov/files/SEC_Strategic_Plan_FY18-FY22_FINAL.pdf (accessed on 12 January 2024).
26. Cueva, C., Roberts, R. E., Spencer, T., et al. (2015). Cortisol and testosterone increase financial risk taking and may destabilize markets. Scientific Reports, 5(1). https://doi.org/10.1038/srep11206
27. Daley, B., & Green, B. (2016). An Information‐Based Theory of Time‐Varying Liquidity. The Journal of Finance, 71(2), 809–870. https://doi.org/10.1111/jofi.12272
28. Doering, J., Kizys, R., Juan, A. A., et al. (2019). Metaheuristics for rich portfolio optimisation and risk management: Current state and future trends. Operations Research Perspectives, 6, 100121. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.orp.2019.100121
29. ESMA. (2023). Opinion on the Trading Venue Perimeter. Available online: https://www.esma.europa.eu/sites/default/files/library/ESMA70-156-6383 Final Report on ESMA%27s Opinion on the trading venue perimeter.pdf (accessed on 12 January 2024).
30. European Central Bank. (2019). Algorithmic trading: trends and existing regulation. Available online: https://www.bankingsupervision.europa.eu/press/publications/newsletter/2019/html/ssm.nl190213_5.en.html. (accessed on 12 January 2024).
31. Fabozzi, F. J., & Markowitz, H. M. (2011). The Theory and Practice of Investment Management: Asset Allocation, Valuation, Portfolio Construction, and Strategies. Wiley. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118267028.
32. FCA. (2020). The MiFID 2 Guide. Available online: https://www.handbook.fca.org.uk/ (accessed on 12 January 2024).
33. Federal Financial Supervisory Authority. (2018). Big data meets artificial intelligence. Federal Financial Supervisory Authority.
34. Financial Conduct Authority. (2018). Algorithmic Trading Compliance in Wholesale Markets. Available online: https://www.fca.org.uk/publication/multi-firm-reviews/algorithmic-trading-compliance-wholesale-markets.pdf (accessed on 12 January 2024).
35. Fong, K. Y. L., Holden, C. W., & Trzcinka, C. A. (2017). What Are the Best Liquidity Proxies for Global Research? Review of Finance, 21(4), 1355–1401. https://doi.org/10.1093/rof/rfx003
36. Gang, T. U., & Choi, J. H. (2023). Optimal Investment in an Illiquid Market with Search Frictions and Transaction Costs. Applied Mathematics & Optimization, 88(1). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00245-023-09971-7
37. Hartman, S. R., & Green, M. S. (2020). Forecasting the CFTC’s 2020 Agenda. Available online: https://www.steptoe.com/en/news-publications/forecasting-the-cftcs-2020-agenda.html. (accessed on 12 January 2024).
38. Hassanien, A. E., Tolba, M. F., Shaalan, K., & Azar, A. T. (2019). Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing. In: Proceedings of the International Conference on Advanced Intelligent Systems and Informatics 2018. Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-99010-1
39. He, G., & Litterman, R. (2002). The Intuition Behind Black-Litterman Model Portfolios. SSRN Electronic Journal. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.334304
40. Hu, R., & Watt, S. M. (2014). An Agent-Based Financial Market Simulator for Evaluation of Algorithmic Trading Strategies. In: 6th International Conference on Advances in System Simulation. Nice, France. pp. 221-227.
41. Huber, C. (2019). oTree: The bubble game. Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Finance, 22, 3–6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbef.2018.12.001
42. IOSCO. (2011). Regulatory Issues Raised by the Impact of Technological Changes on Market Integrity and Efficiency Available online: https://www.iosco.org/library/pubdocs/pdf/IOSCOPD354.pdf (accessed on 12 January 2024).
43. Jankowski, J., & Shank, T. (2010). A Comparison of Online Stock Trading Simulators for Teaching Investments. Available online: https://www.jstor.org/stable/41948638 (accessed on 12 January 2024).
44. Kapsis, & Ilias. (2020). Artificial intelligence in financial services: systemic implications and regulatory responses. Available online: https://bradscholars.brad.ac.uk/handle/10454/17935 (accessed on 12 January 2024).
45. Keller, A. J. (2012). Robocops: Regulating High Frequency Trading After the Flash Crash of 2010. Available online: https://kb.osu.edu/bitstream/handle/1811/71570/OSLJ_V73N6_1457.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y (accessed on 12 January 2024).
46. Kim, T. H., Choi, B., Lee, J.-N., et al. (2021). Portfolio effects of knowledge management strategies on firm performance: Complementarity or substitutability? Information & Management, 58(4), 103468. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.im.2021.103468
47. Kolm, P. N., Tütüncü, R., & Fabozzi, F. J. (2014). 60 Years of portfolio optimization: Practical challenges and current trends. European Journal of Operational Research, 234(2), 356–371. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2013.10.060
48. Kwak, Y., Song, J., & Lee, H. (2021). Neural network with fixed noise for index-tracking portfolio optimization. Expert Systems with Applications, 183, 115298. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2021.115298
49. Labonte, M. (2020). Who Regulates Whom? An Overview of the U.S. Financial Regulatory Framework. Congressional Research Service, 34. https://docplayer.pub/docs/16fa1_who-regulates-whom-an-overview-of-the-u-s-financial.html
50. Lee, C.F., & Lee, A. C. (2022). Encyclopedia of Finance. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-91231-4
51. Lee, J., & Schu, L. (2022). Regulation of Algorithmic Trading: Frameworks or Human Supervision and Direct Market Interventions. European Business Law Review, 33(2), 193–226. https://doi.org/10.54648/eulr2022006
52. Legislation, T. (2020). Onshoring and the Temporary Transitional Power. Available online: https://www.fca.org.uk/brexit/onshoring-temporary-transitional-power-ttp (accessed on 12 January 2024).
53. Lejarraga, T., Woike, J. K., & Hertwig, R. (2016). Description and experience: How experimental investors learn about booms and busts affects their financial risk taking. Cognition, 157, 365–383. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2016.10.001
54. Liu, B., & Zhao, Q. (2022). Financial Derivative Price Forecasting and Trading for Multiple Time Horizons with Deep Long Short-Term Memory Networks. Scientific Programming, 2022, 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/6526512
55. Lu, Y.-N., Li, S.-P., Zhong, L.-X., et al. (2018). A clustering-based portfolio strategy incorporating momentum effect and market trend prediction. Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, 117, 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chaos.2018.10.012
56. Lwin, K. T., Qu, R., & MacCarthy, B. L. (2017). Mean-VaR portfolio optimization: A nonparametric approach. European Journal of Operational Research, 260(2), 751–766. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2017.01.005
57. Ma, Y., Han, R., & Wang, W. (2020). Prediction-Based Portfolio Optimization Models Using Deep Neural Networks. IEEE Access, 8, 115393–115405. https://doi.org/10.1109/access.2020.3003819
58. Manrai, R., & Gupta, K. P. (2022). Investor’s perceptions on artificial intelligence (AI) technology adoption in investment services in India. Journal of Financial Services Marketing, 28(1), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41264-021-00134-9
59. Markowitz, H. (1952). Portfolio Selection. The Journal of Finance, 7(1), 77. https://doi.org/10.2307/2975974
60. Metaxiotis, K., & Liagkouras, K. (2012). Multiobjective Evolutionary Algorithms for Portfolio Management: A comprehensive literature review. Expert Systems with Applications, 39(14), 11685–11698. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2012.04.053
61. Moazeni, S., Coleman, T. F., & Li, Y. (2010). Optimal Portfolio Execution Strategies and Sensitivity to Price Impact Parameters. SIAM Journal on Optimization, 20(3), 1620–1654. https://doi.org/10.1137/080715901
62. Moffit, T., Stull, C., & McKinney, H. (2010). Learning Through Equity Trading Simulation. American Journal of Business Education (AJBE), 3(2), 65–74. https://doi.org/10.19030/ajbe.v3i2.386
63. Montgomerie-Neilson, G. (2012). Selecting the Worst-Case Portfolio: A proposed pre-trade risk validation algorithm of SPAN. Available online: https://www.diva-portal.org/smash/get/diva2:555872/FULLTEXT01.pdf (accessed on 12 January 2024).
64. Nazareth A. L. (2015). SEC Adopts Regulation SCI to Strengthen Securities Market Infrastructure. Available online: https://corpgov.law.harvard.edu/2015/01/07/sec-adopts-regulation-sci-to-strengthen-securities-market-infrastructure/ (accessed on 12 January 2024).
65. Olorunnimbe, K., & Viktor, H. (2022). Deep learning in the stock market—a systematic survey of practice, backtesting, and applications. Artificial Intelligence Review, 56(3), 2057–2109. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10462-022-10226-0
66. Piehlmaier, D. M. (2022). Overconfidence and the adoption of robo-advice: why overconfident investors drive the expansion of automated financial advice. Financial Innovation, 8(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40854-021-00324-3
67. Pramod, D., & Raman, R. (2022). Intention to use Artificial Intelligence services in Financial Investment Decisions. 2022 International Conference on Decision Aid Sciences and Applications (DASA). https://doi.org/10.1109/dasa54658.2022.9765183
68. Qin, Z. (2015). Mean-variance model for portfolio optimization problem in the simultaneous presence of random and uncertain returns. European Journal of Operational Research, 245(2), 480–488. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2015.03.017
69. Qiu, R., Chan, W. K. V., Chen, W., et al. (2022). City, Society, and Digital Transformation. Springer International Publishing.
70. Raschner, P. (2021). Algorithms put to test: Control of algorithms in securities trading through mandatory market simulations? Available online: https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=3807935 (accessed on 12 January 2024).
71. Ren, F., Lu, Y.-N., Li, S.-P., et al. (2017). Dynamic Portfolio Strategy Using Clustering Approach. PLOS ONE, 12(1), e0169299. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0169299
72. Riemann., Charlotte, J. (2022). An examination of critical factors influencing the future usage intention of innovative digital financial solutions for investment activities: consumers’ attitude towards online trading services provided by Neobanks in Germany Available online: https://run.unl.pt/handle/10362/138767 (accessed on 12 January 2024).
73. Roll, R., & Ross, S. A. (1980). An Empirical Investigation of the Arbitrage Pricing Theory. The Journal of Finance, 35(5), 1073–1103. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6261.1980.tb02197.x
74. Sadoghi, A., & Vecer, J. (2022). Optimal liquidation problem in illiquid markets. European Journal of Operational Research, 296(3), 1050–1066. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2021.05.020
75. Sankar, J.R., Bhaskar Udaya, N.U. (2022). A Study on Problems of Investors in Derivatives Trading W.R.T Select Cities Of Andhra Pradesh Available online: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/357701627_a_study_on_problems_of_investors_in_derivatives_trading_wrt_select_cities_of_andhra_pradesh/link/61dbff43d4500608169f52e6/download (accessed on 12 January 2024).
76. Sharpe, W. F. (1970). Portfolio Theory and Capital Markets. Available online: https://www.gsb.stanford.edu/faculty-research/books/portfolio-theory-capital-markets (accessed on 12 January 2024).
77. Ta, V.-D., Liu, C.-M., & Tadesse, D. A. (2020). Portfolio Optimization-Based Stock Prediction Using Long-Short Term Memory Network in Quantitative Trading. Applied Sciences, 10(2), 437. https://doi.org/10.3390/app10020437
78. Tao, R., Su, C.-W., Xiao, Y., et al. (2021). Robo advisors, algorithmic trading and investment management: Wonders of fourth industrial revolution in financial markets. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 163, 120421. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2020.120421
79. Tatewaki, K. (2012). Banking and Finance in Japan (RLE Banking & Finance), 98–114. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203109298-14
80. The European Commission. (2017). Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2017/589 of 19 July 2016. Available online: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/PDF/?uri=CELEX:32017R0589&from=EN (accessed on 12 January 2024).
81. The European Commission. (2017). Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2017/582 of 29 June 2016. Available online: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/PDF/?uri=CELEX:32017R0582&rid=1 (accessed on 12 January 2024).
82. Tranfield, D., Denyer, D., & Smart, P. (2003). Towards a Methodology for Developing Evidence‐Informed Management Knowledge by Means of Systematic Review. British Journal of Management, 14(3), 207–222. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8551.00375
83. Tubert-Brohman, I., Sherman, W., Repasky, M., et al. (2013). Improved Docking of Polypeptides with Glide. Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling, 53(7), 1689–1699. https://doi.org/10.1021/ci400128m
84. United States Patent. (2014) United States Patent. 2. Available online: https://patentimages.storage.googleapis.com/1b/94/d7/6a8467f14eb2d2/US10296973.pdf (accessed on 12 January 2024).
85. Vijayalakshmi Pai, G. A. (2017). Metaheuristics for Portfolio Optimization: An Introduction using MATLAB. Available online: https://www.wiley.com/en-us/Metaheuristics+for+Portfolio+Optimization%3A+An+Introduction+using+MATLAB-p-9781119482796. (accessed on 12 January 2024).
86. Vyetrenko, S., Byrd, D., Petosa, N., et al. (2020). Get real. Proceedings of the First ACM International Conference on AI in Finance. https://doi.org/10.1145/3383455.3422561
87. Wellman, M. P., Amy, G., Peter, S., et al. (2003). The 2001 Trading Agent Competition. Electronic Markets, 13(1), 4–12. https://doi.org/10.1080/1019678032000062212
88. Wu, X, Chen, H., Wang, J., et al. (2020). Adaptive stock trading strategies with deep reinforcement learning methods. Information Sciences, 538, 142–158. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ins.2020.05.066
89. Yang, H., Liu, X.-Y., Zhong, S., et al. (2020). Deep reinforcement learning for automated stock trading. Proceedings of the First ACM International Conference on AI in Finance. https://doi.org/10.1145/3383455.3422540
90. Zaineb, E. K., Sahar, S., & Zouhir, M. (2022). Pricing American Put Option using RBF-NN: New Simulation of Black-Scholes. Moroccan Journal of Pure and Applied Analysis, 8(1), 78–91. https://doi.org/10.2478/mjpaa-2022-0007

Refbacks

• There are currently no refbacks.

Copyright (c) 2024 Meshal I. Alhusaynan, Majed Almashari

https://comparebrokers.co/compare/stock-simulators/https://systems.enpress-publisher.com/index.php/jipd/article/view/4463