Proposed Rule

Proposed Rule

Choosing an item from full text search results will bring you to those results. Pressing enter in the search box will also bring you to search results. Choosing an item from suggestions will bring you directly to the content.

Background and more details are available in the Search & Navigation guide.

You may be interested in this older document that published on 03/09/2022 with action ‘Proposed rule.’

Cybersecurity Risk Management for Investment Advisers, Registered Investment Companies, and Business Development Companies; Reopening of Comment Period

Published Document: 2023-05766 (88 FR 16921)

This document has been published in the Federal Register. Use the PDF linked in the document sidebar for the official electronic format.

Published Document: 2023-05766 (88 FR 16921)

• Document Details

Published Content – Document Details

Agency Securities and Exchange Commission Agency/Docket Numbers Release Nos. 33-11167 34-97144 IA-6263 IC-34855 File No. S7-04-22 CFR 17 CFR 230 17 CFR 232 17 CFR 239 17 CFR 270 17 CFR 274 17 CFR 275 17 CFR 279 Document Citation 88 FR 16921 Document Number 2023-05766 Document Type Proposed Rule Pages 16921-16922 (2 pages) Publication Date 03/21/2023 RIN 3235-AN08

Published Content – Document Details
Official Content
Official Content
Published Content – Document Details

Agency Securities and Exchange Commission Agency/Docket Numbers Release Nos. 33-11167 34-97144 IA-6263 IC-34855 File No. S7-04-22 CFR 17 CFR 230 17 CFR 232 17 CFR 239 17 CFR 270 17 CFR 274 17 CFR 275 17 CFR 279 Document Citation 88 FR 16921 Document Number 2023-05766 Document Type Proposed Rule Pages 16921-16922 (2 pages) Publication Date 03/21/2023 RIN 3235-AN08

Published Content – Document Details
Published Content – Document Dates

Comments Close 05/22/2023 Effective Date 03/09/2022 Dates Text The comment period for the proposed rules published in the Federal Register on March 9, 2022, at 87 FR 13524 is reopened. Comments should be received on or before May 22, 2023.

Published Content – Document Dates
Enhanced Content – Table of Contents

• AGENCY:
• ACTION:
• SUMMARY:
• DATES:
• ADDRESSES:
• FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
• SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
• I. Background
• II. Reopening of the Comment Period
• Footnotes

Enhanced Content – Table of Contents
Enhanced Content – Related Documents

FederalRegister.gov uses the agency dockets published with the document to display related documents.

File No. S7-04-22 (2 Documents)
Date		Action	Title
03/21/2023	Proposed rule; reopening of comment period.	Cybersecurity Risk Management for Investment Advisers, Registered Investment Companies, and Business Development Companies; Reopening of Comment Period
03/09/2022	Proposed rule.	Cybersecurity Risk Management for Investment Advisers, Registered Investment Companies, and Business Development Companies

Enhanced Content – Related Documents
Enhanced Content – Public Comments
Comments are no longer being accepted. See DATES for details.
Enhanced Content – Public Comments
Enhanced Content – Regulations.gov Data
Additional information is not currently available for this document.
Enhanced Content – Regulations.gov Data
Enhanced Content – Sharing
Enhanced Content – Sharing
Enhanced Content – Print
Enhanced Content – Print
Enhanced Content – Document Statistics

Document page views are updated periodically throughout the day and are cumulative counts for this document. Counts are subject to sampling, reprocessing and revision (up or down) throughout the day. Page views 4,045 as of 08/04/2025 at 2:15 am EDT

Enhanced Content – Document Statistics
Enhanced Content – Other Formats

This document is also available in the following formats: JSON Normalized attributes and metadata XML Original full text XML MODS Government Publishing Office metadata More information and documentation can be found in our developer tools pages.

Enhanced Content – Other Formats
Public Inspection

This PDF is the current document as it appeared on Public Inspection on 03/20/2023 at 8:45 am. It was viewed 52 times while on Public Inspection. If you are using public inspection listings for legal research, you should verify the contents of the documents against a final, official edition of the Federal Register. Only official editions of the Federal Register provide legal notice of publication to the public and judicial notice to the courts under 44 U.S.C. 1503 & 1507. Learn more here.

Public Inspection
Published Document: 2023-05766 (88 FR 16921)

This document has been published in the Federal Register. Use the PDF linked in the document sidebar for the official electronic format.

Document Headings

Document headings vary by document type but may contain the following:

1. the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document
2. the number of the CFR title and the number of each part the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly related to
3. the agency docket number / agency internal file number
4. the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory Actions

Securities and Exchange Commission

1. 17 CFR Parts 230, 232, 239, 270, 274, 275, and 279
2. [Release Nos. 33-11167; 34-97144; IA-6263; IC-34855; File No. S7-04-22]
3. RIN 3235-AN08

AGENCY:

Securities and Exchange Commission.

ACTION:

Proposed rule; reopening of comment period.

SUMMARY:

The Securities and Exchange Commission (“Commission”) is reopening the comment period for a release (“Investment Management Cybersecurity Release”) proposing new rules under the Investment Advisers Act of 1940 (“Advisers Act”) and the Investment Company Act of 1940 (“Investment Company Act”) that would require registered investment advisers (“advisers”) and investment companies (“funds”) to adopt and implement written cybersecurity policies and procedures reasonably designed to address cybersecurity risks, disclose information about cybersecurity risks and incidents, report information confidentially to the Commission about certain cybersecurity incidents, and maintain related records. Reopening the comment period for the Investment Management Cybersecurity Release will allow interested persons additional time to analyze the issues and prepare their comments in light of other regulatory developments on cybersecurity.

DATES:

The comment period for the proposed rules published in the Federal Register on March 9, 2022, at 87 FR 13524 is reopened. Comments should be received on or before May 22, 2023.

ADDRESSES:

Comments may be submitted by any of the following methods:

Electronic Comments

• Use the Commission’s internet comment form (http://www.sec.gov/​rules/​submitcomments.htm); or
• Send an email torule-comments@sec.gov. Please include File Number S7-04-22 on the subject line.

Paper Comments

• Send paper comments to Secretary, Securities and Exchange Commission, 100 F Street NE, Washington, DC 20549-1090.

All submissions should refer to File Number S7-04-22. The file number should be included on the subject line if email is used. To help the Commission process and review your comments more efficiently, please use only one method of submission. The Commission will post all comments on the Commission’s website ( http://www.sec.gov/​rules/​proposed.shtml). Comments are also available for website viewing and printing in the Commission’s Public Reference Room, 100 F Street NE, Washington, DC 20549, on official business days between the hours of 10 a.m. and 3 p.m. Operating conditions may limit access to the Commission’s Public Reference Room. All comments received will be posted without change; the Commission does not edit personal identifying information from submissions. You should submit only information that you wish to make available publicly.

Studies, memoranda, or other substantive items may be added by the Commission or staff to the comment file during this rulemaking. A notification of the inclusion in the comment file of any such materials will be made available on the Commission’s website. To ensure direct electronic receipt of such notifications, sign up through the “Stay Connected” option at www.sec.gov to receive notifications by email.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Alexis Palascak, Senior Counsel; Christopher Staley, Branch Chief; or Melissa Roverts Harke, Assistant Director, Investment Adviser Regulation Office, Division of Investment Management, (202) 551-6787 or IArules@sec.gov; Y. Rachel Kuo, Senior Counsel; Sara Cortes, Special Senior Counsel; or Brian McLaughlin Johnson, Assistant Director, Investment Company Regulation Office, Division of Investment Management, (202) 551-6792 or IM-Rules@sec.gov; or David Joire, Senior Special Counsel, Chief Counsel’s Office, Division of Investment Management, (202) 551-6825 or IMOCC@sec.gov, Securities and Exchange Commission, 100 F Street NE, Washington, DC 20549-8549.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

I. Background

The Commission has proposed rules 206(4)-9 under the Advisers Act and 38a-2 under the Investment Company Act that would require advisers and funds to adopt and implement cybersecurity policies and procedures addressing a number of elements in the Investment Management Cybersecurity Release. [1] The Investment Management Cybersecurity Release also includes amendments to adviser and fund disclosure requirements to provide current and prospective advisory clients and fund shareholders with improved information regarding cybersecurity risks and cybersecurity incidents. In addition, the proposal would require advisers to report significant cybersecurity incidents affecting the adviser, or its fund or private fund clients, to the Commission on a confidential basis. Finally, the proposal would require advisers and funds to maintain certain records related to the proposed cybersecurity risk management rules. The original comment period for the Investment Management Cybersecurity Release ended on April 11, 2022.

The Commission is proposing other rules and amendments on cybersecurity issues. [2] In the Regulation S-P: Privacy of Consumer Financial Information and Safeguarding Customer Information Release (“Regulation S-P Release”), the Commission is proposing rule ( printed page 16922) amendments that would require brokers and dealers, investment companies, and investment advisers registered with the Commission to adopt written policies and procedures for incident response programs to address unauthorized access to or use of customer information, including procedures for providing timely notification to individuals affected by an incident involving sensitive customer information with details about the incident and information designed to help affected individuals respond appropriately. [3] The Commission also is proposing to broaden the scope of information covered by amending requirements for safeguarding customer records and information, and for properly disposing of consumer report information. In addition, the proposed amendments would extend the application of the safeguards provisions to transfer agents. The proposed amendments would also include requirements to maintain written records documenting compliance with the proposed amended rules. Finally, the proposed amendments would conform annual privacy notice delivery provisions to the terms of an exception provided by a statutory amendment to the Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act.

In the Cybersecurity Risk Management Rule for Broker-Dealers, Clearing Agencies, Major Security-Based Swap Participants, the Municipal Securities Rulemaking Board, National Securities Associations, National Securities Exchanges, Security-Based Swap Data Repositories, Security-Based Swap Dealers, and Transfer Agents Release (“Cybersecurity Release”), the Commission is proposing a new rule and form and amendments to existing recordkeeping rules to require broker-dealers, clearing agencies, major security-based swap participants, the Municipal Securities Rulemaking Board, national securities associations, national securities exchanges, security-based swap data repositories, security-based swap dealers, and transfer agents to address cybersecurity risks through policies and procedures, immediate notification to the Commission of the occurrence of a significant cybersecurity incident and, as applicable, reporting detailed information to the Commission about a significant cybersecurity incident, and public disclosures that would improve transparency with respect to cybersecurity risks and significant cybersecurity incidents. [4] In addition, the Commission is proposing amendments to existing clearing agency exemption orders to require the retention of records that would need to be made under the proposed cybersecurity requirements. Finally, the Commission is proposing amendments to address the potential availability to security-based swap dealers and major security-based swap participants of substituted compliance in connection with those requirements.

In the Regulation Systems Compliance and Integrity Release (“Regulation SCI Release,” and together with the Regulation S-P and Cybersecurity Releases, the “Related Proposals”), the Commission is proposing amendments to Regulation Systems Compliance and Integrity (“Regulation SCI”) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. [5] The proposed amendments would expand the definition of “SCI entity” to include a broader range of key market participants in the U.S. securities market infrastructure, and update certain provisions of Regulation SCI to take account of developments in the technology landscape of the markets since the adoption of Regulation SCI in 2014. The proposed expansion would add the following entities to the definition of “SCI entity”: registered security-based swap data repositories; registered broker-dealers exceeding an asset or transaction activity threshold; and additional clearing agencies exempted from registration. The proposed updates would amend provisions of Regulation SCI relating to: (i) systems classification and lifecycle management; (ii) third party/vendor management; (iii) cybersecurity; (iv) the SCI review; (v) the role of current SCI industry standards; and (vi) recordkeeping and related matters. Further, the Commission is requesting comment on whether significant-volume ATSs and/or broker-dealers using electronic or automated systems for trading of corporate debt securities or municipal securities should be subject to Regulation SCI. The comment period for each of the Related Proposals ends May 22, 2023.

II. Reopening of the Comment Period

The Commission is reopening the comment period for the proposed rules so that commenters may consider whether there would be any effects of the Related Proposals that the Commission should consider in connection with the proposed rules. Therefore, the Commission is reopening the comment period for Release No. 33-11028 “Cybersecurity Risk Management for Investment Advisers, Registered Investment Companies, and Business Development Companies” until May 22, 2023.

Understanding Regulated Investment Companies (RIC): Taxation, Eligibility, and Examples

A regulated investment company (RIC), as defined by the Internal Revenue Service (IRS), is a specific type of investment entity that avoids double taxation on income generated from capital gains, dividends, and interest. RICs include mutual funds, exchange-traded funds (ETFs), real estate investment trusts (REITs), and unit investment trusts (UITs). To qualify for RIC status under IRS regulations, an investment company must:

1. Be registered as a corporation or other legal entity with the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC)
2. Elect to be deemed a regulated investment company
3. Derive more than 90% of its income from capital gains, dividends, or interest earned on investments
4. Distribute at least 90% of its net investment income in the form of dividends, capital gains, or interest to shareholders
5. Maintain at least 50% of its total assets in cash, cash equivalents, or securities.

The conduit theory is the underlying principle behind RICs. It allows investment companies to pass through their income to individual investors without double taxation – once at the corporate level and again at the shareholder level. This concept is also known as “pass-through” income.

Investment companies follow the rules established under Regulation M of the IRS, as outlined in U.S. code title 26, sections 851 through 855, 860, and 4982. By allowing for pass-through income, RICs can help investors save on taxes while efficiently managing their funds.

RIC Requirements and Eligibility

To be eligible as a regulated investment company, an entity must meet the following conditions:

1. Exist and register as a corporation or other legal entity with the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC)
2. Elect to be considered a regulated investment company under The Investment Company Act of 1940
3. Derive more than 90% of its income from capital gains, dividends, or interest earned on investments
4. Distribute at least 90% of its net investment income to shareholders in the form of capital gains, dividends, or interest
5. Hold more than 50% of total assets as cash, cash equivalents, or securities
6. Not hold more than 25% of total assets in any one issuer’s securities (unless they are government securities or securities of other RICs)

By meeting these requirements and being granted RIC status, investment companies can pass through their income to shareholders, thereby avoiding double taxation and allowing for more efficient fund management.

Requirements to Qualify as an RIC

A Regulated Investment Company (RIC) is a specific type of investment entity that can take various forms such as mutual funds, exchange-traded funds (ETFs), real estate investment trusts (REITs), or unit investment trusts (UITs). To qualify for the RIC status and avoid double taxation on income earned, an investment company must adhere to specific conditions established by the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) and Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC).

To become a regulated investment company:
1. The business must exist as a corporation or another entity that would typically be subjected to taxation as a corporation.
2. It should register with the SEC under the Investment Company Act of 1940, provided its income sources and asset diversification meet specified requirements.
3. Elect RIC status by filing Form N-2 with the SEC (Mutual Funds) or Form N-1A (ETFs).
4. Derive at least 90% of its income from capital gains, dividends, or interest earned on investments.
5. Distribute a minimum of 90% of its net investment income as dividends to shareholders.
6. Hold at least 50% of its total assets in cash, cash equivalents, or securities.
7. No more than 25% of its total assets can be invested in the securities of a single issuer, with exceptions for government securities and other RICs.

These conditions ensure that the investment company functions efficiently as a conduit for income pass-through while minimizing double taxation. Failure to distribute a sufficient percentage of net investment income results in an excise tax imposed by the IRS. These requirements are outlined in U.S. code, title 26, sections 851 through 855, 860, and 4982. The Regulated Investment Company Modernization Act of 2010 (Public Law No: 111-306), which was signed into law on December 22, 2010, updated the regulations governing RICs to address changes in the mutual fund industry and make them more efficient.

Taxation and Income Pass-through for RICs

A regulated investment company (RIC) is a unique type of investment entity that passes through income from capital gains, dividends, or interest earned on investments directly to its individual investors, thus avoiding the double taxation that would typically occur if both the investment company and the investors paid taxes on this income. This concept, also known as the conduit theory, enables RICs to function as a conduit for passing income to shareholders instead of paying corporate income taxes on profits.

According to the Internal Revenue Code (IRC), the conduit mechanism allows qualified RICs to pass through their taxable income to investors by not being subject to corporate income taxation on their gains, dividends, or interest earned from investments. Instead, shareholders pay taxes on this income when they receive it as capital gains or ordinary dividend income. This structure helps prevent double taxation and is a significant benefit for RICs, making them an attractive investment choice for many individuals.

The conduit theory and pass-through income are based on the understanding that RICs do not retain any earnings or profits, as they distribute 90% or more of their net investment income annually to investors. By doing so, RICs avoid paying corporate income taxes, ensuring that only individual shareholders pay taxes on their portion of the company’s income.

To qualify for this tax treatment, an entity must meet specific eligibility requirements as outlined by the IRS under Regulation M. For example, it must exist as a corporation or other eligible entity, be registered with the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), elect to be treated as an RIC, derive at least 90% of its income from capital gains, interest, or dividends earned on investments, and distribute 90% or more of its net investment income to shareholders. Additionally, a company’s total assets must consist of at least 50% cash, cash equivalents, or securities and not exceed 25% in any single issuer’s securities unless they are government securities or from other RICs.

Understanding the taxation and income pass-through mechanisms of regulated investment companies is crucial for investors, as these structures provide substantial benefits that can help maximize potential returns while minimizing double taxation.

Types of Regulated Investment Companies

A regulated investment company (RIC) can take on several forms in the financial sector. Among these are mutual funds, exchange-traded funds (ETFs), real estate investment trusts (REITs), and unit investment trusts (UITs). In each case, the business structure is required to meet specific eligibility criteria set forth by the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) to qualify as a pass-through entity.

Mutual Funds
A mutual fund is an open-ended investment company that pools together individual investor’s money and invests in various securities, including stocks, bonds, or other assets. Mutual funds can be actively managed, where the fund manager selects individual securities, or passively managed, which tracks a specific market index. Regardless of management style, mutual funds must adhere to IRS requirements, such as distributing at least 90% of their income and maintaining a diversified portfolio to qualify for RIC status.

Exchange-Traded Funds (ETFs)
An exchange-traded fund is a type of investment fund traded on stock exchanges much like individual stocks or bonds, making it more accessible and transparent than mutual funds. ETFs aim to replicate the performance of specific market indices, sectors, or commodities. Like other RICs, an ETF must distribute 90% of its income to shareholders while maintaining at least 90% of assets in qualifying investments. Additionally, ETFs can be traded throughout the trading day on a stock exchange, providing flexibility not found with mutual funds.

Real Estate Investment Trusts (REITs)
A REIT is a company that owns or finances income-generating real estate properties and allows investors to invest in these properties by buying shares in the trust. There are two primary types of REITS: equity and mortgage REITs. Equity REITs generate revenue through rent paid on their properties, while mortgage REITs make money by providing loans secured by real estate. As with other RICs, REITs must distribute at least 90% of their taxable income to shareholders to maintain their qualification status.

Unit Investment Trusts (UITs)
A unit investment trust is a closed-end investment company that offers units representing an undivided interest in the trust’s portfolio. UITs differ from mutual funds by having a fixed number of shares, which are sold to investors as they buy into the fund. This structure allows for more stable capital gains distributions and easier pricing for investors compared to open-ended mutual funds. Like other RICs, UITs must distribute at least 90% of their taxable income to shareholders to meet IRS requirements.

In conclusion, regulated investment companies (RICs) can take on multiple forms, including mutual funds, ETFs, REITs, and UITs. Regardless of the specific form, each RIC must follow eligibility criteria set by the Internal Revenue Service to qualify as a pass-through entity, allowing them to avoid double taxation for both the company and its investors.

Regulation M: The IRS Law Governing RICs

The Internal Revenue Service (IRS) governs Regulated Investment Companies (RICs) through Regulation M, which outlines the specific conditions that must be met for an investment company to qualify for pass-through taxation. This regulation is crucial as it allows RICs, such as mutual funds and exchange-traded funds (ETFs), real estate investment trusts (REITs), and unit investment trusts (UITs), to pass through their income—including capital gains, dividends, and interest—directly to individual investors. By doing so, the RIC itself avoids paying corporate income taxes on its profits, which significantly reduces the overall tax burden for both the company and investors.

Understanding Regulation M’s Significance
The conduit theory, a fundamental concept in the functioning of RICs, states that these investment vehicles serve as conduits for passing along capital gains, dividends, and interest to shareholders. As a result, they do not pay corporate income taxes on their earnings. Instead, the individual investors are responsible for paying income taxes only on their portion of the RIC’s income, ensuring that double taxation is avoided.

Regulation M Requirements
In order for an investment company to qualify as a Regulated Investment Company (RIC) under the IRS regulations, it must first meet specific conditions:
1. Register with and be subject to regulation by the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC).
2. Elect to be treated as an RIC under the Investment Company Act of 1940, as long as it complies with the specified income source and asset diversification requirements.
3. Derive at least 90% of its total gross income from capital gains, dividends, or interest earned on investments.
4. Distribute at least 90% of its net investment income to shareholders in the form of dividends, capital gains distributions, or interest.
5. Maintain a minimum of 50% of total assets as cash, cash equivalents, or securities, with no more than 25% invested in securities issued by any one issuer, except for government securities and RICs.

The IRS regulations regarding RICs are defined in U.S. Code title 26, sections 851 through 855, 860, and 4982. The Regulated Investment Company Modernization Act of 2010 updated these rules to account for the significant changes in the mutual fund industry since the last major overhaul in 1986.

Real-World Impact of Regulation M
The tax treatment of RICs under Regulation M has a profound impact on both investors and the investment industry as a whole. By allowing these entities to pass through their income directly to investors, it reduces overall tax burdens while increasing overall efficiency in fund management. The conduit theory also encourages investment growth by reducing double taxation on capital gains, dividends, and interest earned within RICs, making them an attractive option for individual investors seeking to minimize their tax liabilities while participating in the stock market.

In conclusion, Regulation M plays a critical role in governing the functioning of regulated investment companies, allowing these entities to pass through income directly to shareholders and avoiding double taxation. This regulation has been instrumental in shaping the mutual fund industry as we know it today and continues to serve as a cornerstone for efficient investment management and tax planning for both investors and RICs alike.

RIC’s Role in Investing: Pass-Through Income

Regulated investment companies (RICs) provide investors with significant advantages that help minimize double taxation through the conduit theory and pass-through income. The conduit theory refers to RICs acting as a conduit for passing on capital gains, dividends, and interest to individual shareholders. As per the Internal Revenue Code (IRC), an investment company qualifies for this treatment if it meets specific criteria outlined by Regulation M under U.S. code, title 26, sections 851 through 855, 860, and 4982.

Pass-through income is crucial because both the investment company and its investors could face taxation on the company’s earnings if it did not have this designation. With pass-through income, the investment company does not pay corporate taxes on profits passed to shareholders. Instead, only individual shareholders are subjected to income tax on their received capital gains or interest.

To become an RIC, a business must adhere to certain conditions set forth by the IRS and the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC). It is required to register as an investment company with the SEC and elect this designation under the Investment Company Act of 1940. To maintain this status, it must generate at least 90% of its income from capital gains, dividends, or interest on investments. Furthermore, the RIC must distribute a minimum of 90% of its net investment income to shareholders. If the company fails to do so, it may be subjected to an excise tax.

The importance of pass-through income for investors lies in its ability to minimize double taxation. By structuring their investments as RICs, companies can avoid paying corporate taxes on earnings and let individual investors bear the tax burden. This tax advantage ultimately leads to more efficient fund management and attractive investment opportunities for potential shareholders. The history of regulated investment companies dates back to the 1940 Investment Company Act and has since undergone several updates, including the Regulated Investment Company Modernization Act of 2010.

Examples of RICs include mutual funds, ETFs, REITs, and UITs. Mutual funds pool resources from multiple investors to purchase stocks, bonds or other securities in a diversified portfolio. They are managed by professional fund managers and provide daily liquidity for shareholders. ETFs, like mutual funds, aim for diversification but trade on an exchange as individual shares. Real estate investment trusts (REITs) focus specifically on income-generating real estate properties while unit investment trusts (UITs) invest in a specific portfolio of securities that do not change over their life cycle.

The Regulated Investment Company Modernization Act of 2010 updated the tax rules governing RICs, addressing changes in the mutual fund industry and resolving administrative issues or uncertainties.

Benefits of Investing in an RIC

Investors seeking a more tax-efficient investment vehicle may want to consider investing in a Regulated Investment Company (RIC). An RIC is an investment company that has met the eligibility criteria set by the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) and allows the income it earns, such as capital gains, interest, or dividends, to be passed directly through to its investors. This means that investors do not pay taxes on their share of RIC’s income until they realize their own gains from selling those shares.

The conduit theory, which lies at the heart of an RIC, helps minimize the tax burden for investors by avoiding double taxation. The company does not pay corporate income taxes on its profits as long as it distributes 90% or more of its net investment income to its shareholders. In essence, an RIC serves as a conduit for passing through income to shareholders, thus eliminating the need for the company and the investors to each pay taxes on the same earnings.

Additionally, RICs offer other benefits. They provide access to professionally managed portfolios of diversified investments that might otherwise be difficult or costly for individual investors to construct themselves. Moreover, due to their large size and economies of scale, RICs can achieve lower transaction costs than most individual investors.

RICs come in various forms, including mutual funds, exchange-traded funds (ETFs), real estate investment trusts (REITs), and unit investment trusts (UITs). Each type has its advantages and suitability to different investor needs and investment goals. For example, mutual funds offer flexibility to buy or sell shares at any time during the trading day. ETFs, on the other hand, combine the benefits of a mutual fund with the transparency and tradability of an individual stock. REITs provide investors with income-producing real estate investments while UITs offer investors fixed portfolios that trade as single units.

The Regulated Investment Company Modernization Act of 2010 was signed into law to update the rules governing RICs due to significant changes in the mutual fund industry and to eliminate obsolete tax rules creating administrative burdens. The act impacted open-end mutual funds, closed-end funds, and most ETFs.

In conclusion, investing in a regulated investment company can yield both tax benefits and access to professional management, making it an attractive choice for many investors. By passing through income to shareholders instead of paying corporate taxes on profits, RICs help minimize investor’s overall tax burden. As a result, RICs offer investors the opportunity to build wealth more efficiently while diversifying their investments across various asset classes.

The History of Regulated Investment Companies

A regulated investment company (RIC) can trace its roots back several decades as an integral part of the financial sector. This investment vehicle has evolved significantly since its inception and played a crucial role in shaping the modern investment landscape. The concept of pass-through income or conduit theory, which allows for the avoidance of double taxation, has been a cornerstone of RICs since their inception.

The first iteration of regulated investment companies emerged in the 1930s and gained prominence following the passage of the Investment Company Act of 1940. This legislation established various rules for the registration and regulation of investment companies, including mutual funds, trusts, and other similar entities. RICs have since grown to encompass a diverse range of investment vehicles such as exchange-traded funds (ETFs), real estate investment trusts (REITs), and unit investment trusts (UITs).

The tax treatment of regulated investment companies has undergone several significant changes throughout the years. The Regulated Investment Company Modernization Act of 2010, signed into law by President Obama on Dec. 22, 2010, made substantial updates to the rules governing RICs. These amendments were enacted in response to the transformation of the mutual fund industry and the growing need for flexibility in RIC regulations. Prior to these changes, the last major update to the tax treatment of RICs occurred with the Tax Reform Act of 1986.

The Regulated Investment Company Modernization Act brought about a number of improvements to the rules governing RICs. Among the key provisions were adjustments to the rules surrounding tax-exempt income, qualified dividends, and passive income. Additionally, the law made it easier for certain types of RICs to avoid corporate taxes entirely by electing to be treated as a “regulated investment company holding company.” This change was particularly beneficial for REITs that wanted to engage in activities beyond their traditional real estate holdings.

These updates have allowed regulated investment companies to better adapt to the ever-changing financial landscape and continue providing valuable investment opportunities for individual investors. The ongoing evolution of RICs underscores the importance of a flexible regulatory framework and the role it plays in fostering innovation within the investment industry.

Real-World Example: Regulated Investment Companies in Practice

Regulated investment companies (RICs) represent an essential component of various sectors within the financial industry, including mutual funds, exchange-traded funds (ETFs), real estate investment trusts (REITs), and unit investment trusts (UITs). Let’s explore how these different RIC structures function in practice.

Mutual Funds:
One of the most common examples of a regulated investment company is a mutual fund. In this context, investors pool their financial resources together to purchase a diversified portfolio of stocks, bonds, or other securities managed by professional fund managers. The income and capital gains generated by the investments are then passed through to individual shareholders, eliminating double taxation as described in the conduit theory.

Exchange-Traded Funds (ETFs):
An exchange-traded fund is another type of RIC where investors can buy and sell shares directly on a stock exchange, instead of buying mutual fund units through the fund company itself. Like mutual funds, ETFs are structured to pass through income to shareholders as capital gains, dividends, or interest earned from their underlying investments.

Real Estate Investment Trusts (REITs):
Investors seeking real estate investment opportunities often turn to REITs, which own and operate income-generating properties like office buildings, malls, hospitals, and apartment complexes. Similar to mutual funds and ETFs, these companies distribute their rental income to shareholders as dividends. By investing in a REIT, individuals can reap the benefits of real estate ownership without the hassles of property management or maintenance responsibilities.

Unit Investment Trusts (UITs):
Lastly, unit investment trusts differ from mutual funds by issuing redeemable trust units representing an undivided interest in a portfolio of stocks, bonds, or other securities. These trusts are designed to last for specific time intervals. Like RICs in general, UIT income and capital gains are distributed to shareholders, allowing them to avoid paying double taxes on the earnings.

The Regulated Investment Company Modernization Act of 2010 made significant updates to the tax rules governing these structures, ensuring they remain adaptable for an ever-evolving financial landscape.

FAQs

What is a Regulated Investment Company (RIC)?
A regulated investment company (RIC) refers to specific types of investment entities such as mutual funds, ETFs, REITs, and UITs that are registered with the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC). Eligible RICs avoid double taxation by passing through income from capital gains, dividends, or interest earned on investments directly to their individual shareholders. This is known as pass-through income or conduit theory, which saves investors from having to pay both corporate and personal income taxes on the same earnings.

What are the specific conditions a business must meet to be considered an RIC?
To qualify as a regulated investment company, a business must:
1. Exist as a corporation or other entity subject to corporate taxation.
2. Register with the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC).
3. Elect to be deemed an RIC under the Investment Company Act of 1940.
4. Derive at least 90% of its income from capital gains, interest, or dividends earned on investments.
5. Distribute a minimum of 90% of net investment income in the form of capital gains, interest, or dividends to shareholders.
6. Have at least 50% of total assets as cash, cash equivalents, or securities.
7. Not invest more than 25% of total assets into securities of one issuer (except for government securities or other RICs).

What is the significance of Regulation M and its role in taxation for RICs?
Regulated Investment Companies, including mutual funds, ETFs, REITs, and UITs, are subject to specific IRS regulations like Regulation M. These rules allow these entities to pass through their income (capital gains, dividends, or interest) to individual investors, effectively avoiding double taxation on corporate income.

What are the benefits of investing in a regulated investment company?
Benefits of investing in RICs include:
1. Lower taxes due to pass-through income and conduit theory.
2. Efficient fund management through professional expertise.
3. Variety of investment options catering to different investor needs.
4. Diversification of risk across multiple assets and sectors.
5. Access to international markets for higher potential returns.
6. Increased liquidity compared to traditional investment vehicles like stocks or bonds.

When was the last major update to RIC tax laws?
The Regulated Investment Company Modernization Act of 2010 was signed into law on Dec. 22, 2010, making changes to the rules governing RICs that had become outdated or burdensome for the industry. The last significant update prior to this was the Tax Reform Act of 1986.

What types of entities can qualify as a regulated investment company?
Regulated Investment Companies include, but are not limited to:
1. Mutual Funds
2. Exchange-Traded Funds (ETFs)
3. Real Estate Investment Trusts (REITs)
4. Unit Investment Trusts (UITs)
5. Closed-End Funds
6. Money Market Funds
7. Business Development Companies (BDCs)
8. Tender Option Bond Funds
9. Farmer Cooperative Organizations.

Recent Posts

• Understanding the Total Debt-to-Capitalization Ratio: Measuring a Company’s Leverage
• Understanding Total Bond Funds: Structure, Operation, and Popular Options
• Understanding Tort Law: Categories, Famous Cases and Reform
• Understanding the Toronto Stock Exchange (TSX): Canada’s Premier Stock Market
• Understanding Top Line Growth and Its Importance for Institutional Investors

https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2023/03/21/2023-05766/cybersecurity-risk-management-for-investment-advisers-registered-investment-companies-and-businesshttps://financefacts101.com/understanding-regulated-investment-companies-ric-taxation-eligibility-and-examples/